Art Madrid'26 – Punto gallery in Art Madrid\'15

Directed by Jose Antonio Agrait, the second generation of the Agrait family, PUNTO gallery takes hard its international interest and organizes exhibitions curating working for the constant renewal of artistic proposals by promoting emerging artists working closely with museums, galleries, public and private institutions. 
Artists participating in Art Madrid'15: Julio Le Parc, Carmen Calvo, Valerio Adami, Juan Genovés, Victor Vasarely, José María Labra, Equipo Realidad, Natividad Navalón and José María Yturralde.

Equipo Realidad (http://www.art-madrid.com/artista-participante-am15/equipo-realidad), formed by Joan Cardells and Jorge Ballester, was born in Valencia in 1966, in the context of the Franco developmentalism, and voluntarily was dissolved ten years later. Equipo Realidad joins the critical figuration, which develops a painting with strong political and appropriation of images from everyday reality and history of art. Through serial works, the team analyzed the social transformation of the sixties, marked by expanding technology, consumerism and takeoff mass media. Your making critical position, demystifying the consumer society, underlies the treatment of iconographic symbols through the values that always have a double and ironic reading evidenced in works like 86 misses in swimsuit.

Equipo Realidad said: "What interests us is not reality, but his image", and therefore, taken as reference for his works images from magazines, advertisements and catalogs. They have been defined as a "radical painters that while denying authorship postulate teamwork, social criticism and political commitment", which cost them an absence of critical and without it, they had great difficulty in selling their pictures. Currently the work of Reality Team arouses great interest for both collectors and gallery owners, due to historical and political values associated with it, the same that caused the dissolution of the team in 1976.
 
 
Jose Maria Yturralde. (Valencia, 1942. BA and PhD in Fine Arts from the Polytechnic University of Valencia. Academician of the Royal Academy of Fine Arts of San Carlos de Valencia. Professor of Painting at the Faculty of Fine Arts in Valencia. In the mid-sixties went through a stage of experimentation in the "material informalism", from which evolved into geometric abstraction and the "Op Art" that characterizes him, in which the influences of Vasarely and the Italian specialists and constructivism are detected .
 
In 1966 he worked at the Museum of Spanish Abstract Art in Cuenca, founded by the painter Fernando Zobel. At this time he started working in monochrome with synthetic materials. In 1967 he was a founding member of the Prior Art Group, led by Aguilera Cerni, and began to make Kinetic Art; This interest in technology was accentuated by participating in seminars center Calculating the Complutense University of Madrid, who introduced him to work with computers.
In 1975 he moved to Massachusetts (USA) where he researched and taught at the Center for Advanced Visual Studies. In the eighties, after further the kinetic direction with his "flying structures", he returned to the plane with an attitude that, while remaining constructively rigorous, is more poetic, because of the interplay of colors and instability of the compositions . Currently he is director of the Painting Department of the Polytechnic University of Valencia.

 


ART MADRID’26 INTERVIEW PROGRAM. CONVERSATIONS WITH ADONAY BERMÚDEZ


The practice of the collective DIMASLA (Diana + Álvaro) is situated at a fertile intersection between contemporary art, ecological thinking, and a philosophy of experience that shifts the emphasis from production to attention. Faced with the visual and material acceleration of the present, their work does not propose a head-on opposition, but rather a sensitive reconciliation with time, understood as lived duration rather than as a measure. The work thus emerges as an exercise in slowing down, a pedagogy of perception where contemplating and listening become modes of knowledge.

In the work of DIMASLA (Diana + Álvaro), the territory does not function as a framework but rather as an agent. The landscape actively participates in the process, establishing a dialogical relationship reminiscent of certain eco-critical currents, in which subjectivity is decentralized and recognized as part of a broader framework. This openness implies an ethic of exposure, which is defined as the act of exposing oneself to the climate, the elements, and the unpredictable, and this means accepting vulnerability as an epistemological condition.

The materials—fabrics, pigments, and footprints—serve as surfaces for temporary inscriptions and memories, bearing the marks of time. The initial planning is conceived as an open hypothesis, allowing chance and error to act as productive forces. In this way, the artistic practice of DIMASLA (Diana + Álvaro) articulates a poetics of care and being-with, where creating is, above all, a profound way of feeling and understanding nature.



In a historical moment marked by speed and the overproduction of images, your work seems to champion slowness and listening as forms of resistance. Could it be said that your practice proposes a way of relearning time through aesthetic experience?

Diana: Yes, but more than resistance or vindication, I would speak of reconciliation—of love. It may appear slow, but it is deliberation; it is reflection. Filling time with contemplation or listening is a way of feeling. Aesthetic experience leads us along a path of reflection on what lies outside us and what lies within.


The territory does not appear in your work as a backdrop or a setting, but as an interlocutor. How do you negotiate that conversation between the artist’s will and the voice of the place, when the landscape itself participates in the creative process?

Álvaro: For us, the landscape is like a life partner or a close friend, and naturally this intimate relationship extends into our practice. We go to visit it, to be with it, to co-create together. We engage in a dialogue that goes beyond aesthetics—conversations filled with action, contemplation, understanding, and respect.

Ultimately, in a way, the landscape expresses itself through the material. We respect all the questions it poses, while at the same time valuing what unsettles us, what shapes us, and what stimulates us within this relationship.


The Conquest of the Rabbits I & II. 2021. Process.


In your approach, one senses an ethic of exposure: exposing oneself to the environment, to the weather, to others, to the unpredictable. To what extent is this vulnerability also a form of knowledge?

Diana: For us, this vulnerability teaches us a great deal—above all, humility. When we are out there and feel the cold, the rain, or the sun, we become aware of how small and insignificant we are in comparison to the grandeur and power of nature.

So yes, we understand vulnerability as a profound source of knowledge—one that helps us, among many other things, to let go of our ego and to understand that we are only a small part of a far more complex web.


Sometimes mountains cry too. 2021. Limestone rockfall, sun, rain, wind, pine resin on acrylic on natural cotton canvas, exposed on a blanket of esparto grass and limestone for two months.. 195 cm x 130 cm x 3 cm.


Your works often emerge from prolonged processes of exposure to the environment. Could it be said that the material—the fabrics, the pigments, the traces of the environment—acts as a memory that time writes on you as much as you write on it?

Álvaro: This is a topic for a long conversation, sitting on a rock—it would be very stimulating. But if experiences shape people’s inner lives and define who we are in the present moment, then I would say yes, especially in that sense.

Leaving our comfort zone has led us to learn from the perseverance of plants and the geological calm of mountains. Through this process, we have reconciled ourselves with time, with the environment, with nature, with ourselves, and even with our own practice. Just as fabrics hold the memory of a place, we have relearned how to pay attention and how to understand. Ultimately, it is a way of deepening our capacity to feel.


The fox and his tricks. 2022. Detail.


To what extent do you plan your work, and how much space do you leave for the unexpected—or even for mistakes?

Diana: Our planning is limited to an initial hypothesis. We choose the materials, colours, places, and sometimes even the specific location, but we leave as much room as possible for the unexpected to occur. In the end, that is what it is really about: allowing nature to speak and life to unfold. For us, both the unexpected and mistakes are part of the world’s complexity, and within that complexity we find a form of natural beauty.