SAFE CREATIVE BECOMES THE PLATFORM THAT SUPPORTS CONTEMPORARY ARTISTS IN FACING DIGITAL CHALLENGES.

Thanks to the collaboration with Safe Creative, we have been able to enjoy the Interviews Program with Marisol Salanova, in which seven artists from Art Madrid'25 have shared reflections and creative processes of their work. The world of contemporary art has undergone significant changes in recent years. Creators now face more challenges than ever, not only when exhibiting their work in galleries and contemporary art fairs, but also in protecting their works and identity in the digital world and against the growing impact of artificial intelligence.

For this reason, Safe Creative positions itself as an essential ally for artists who value the effort behind their work, seek to register their creations to generate solid proof of authorship, and wish to protect their personal brand or that of their works and collections.

Since 2007, Safe Creative has been the world's leading private company in generating digital evidence on the internet. Through its copyright registration service, it offers tools tailored to all types of creators. In recent years, it has evolved into a comprehensive platform that not only helps artists register their finished works but also certifies human contribution in the creative process, automatically informs about reserved rights, and allows for publishing and licensing works. Additionally, it has become a reference for articles, news, and trends on intellectual property. It also simplifies the trademark registration process in various territories, both nationally and internationally, addressing a crucial aspect for contemporary artists.

The goal is clear: to support creators in all aspects related to their copyrights, style, and brand image. From documenting the creation of their works to protecting their artistic name, Safe Creative enables artists to present their identity coherently and professionally, opening up new opportunities.

Beyond personal identity, it is recommended to register the names of specific works, notable projects, or collections involving collaborations with other creators as trademarks. This includes names of fairs or residencies, for example. This type of protection helps prevent others from appropriating the name and reputation of artists, organizations, and works, while facilitating the commercialization, communication, and promotion of creations.

All of this is made possible by Safe Creative's intelligent use of new technologies. Through digital fingerprints, timestamps, and blockchain, the platform generates valid and verifiable evidence in all countries that are signatories to the Berne Convention. These proofs are tamper-proof and enhance the confidence of buyers, gallerists, and creators. The same philosophy of technological efficiency is applied to trademark registration, simplifying a process that was traditionally tedious and complicated.

Additionally, Safe Creative offers a free online exhibition space for its subscribers, which is continually evolving to become a comprehensive solution for those looking to showcase their talent and work. This space allows artists to sell usage licenses comfortably and transparently, and even declare whether they wish to prevent AI companies from using their works to train algorithms.

Safe Creative thus positions itself as a platform that supports the entire journey of any artist, content creator, or company that values their work and wants to showcase their talent to the world in the safest way possible, transcending borders and empowering creativity.

Sponsor of ART MADRID'25

The painting of Daniel Bum (Villena, Alicante, 1994) takes shape as a space for subjective elaboration, where the figure emerges not so much as a representational motif but as a vital necessity. The repetition of this frontal, silent character responds to an intimate process: painting becomes a strategy for navigating difficult emotional experiences—an insistent gesture that accompanies and alleviates feelings of loneliness. In this sense, the figure acts as a mediator between the artist and a complex emotional state, linking the practice of painting to a reconnection with childhood and to a vulnerable dimension of the self.

The strong autobiographical dimension of his work coexists with a formal distance that is not the result of conscious planning, but rather functions as a protective mechanism. Visual restraint, an apparent compositional coolness, and an economy of means do not neutralize emotion; instead, they contain it, avoiding the direct exposure of the traumatic. In this way, the tension between affect and restraint becomes a structural feature of his artistic language. Likewise, the naïve and the disturbing coexist in his painting as inseparable poles, reflecting a subjectivity permeated by mystery and unconscious processes. Many images emerge without a clearly defined prior meaning and only reveal themselves over time, when temporal distance allows for the recognition of the emotional states from which they arose.

The Long Night. Oil, acrylic, and charcoal on canvas. 160 × 200 cm. 2024.

The human figure appears frequently in your work: frontal, silent, suspended. What interests you about this presence that seems both affirmative and absent?

I wouldn’t say that anything in particular interests me. I began painting this figure because there were emotions I couldn’t understand and a feeling that was very difficult for me to process. This character emerged during a very complicated moment in my life, and the act of making it—and remaking it, repeating it again and again—meant that, during the process, I didn’t feel quite so alone. At the same time, it kept me fresh and connected me to an inner child who was broken at that moment, helping me get through the experience in a slightly less bitter way.

Santito. Acrylic and oil on canvas. 81 × 65 cm. 2025.

There is a strong affective dimension in your work, but also a calculated distance, a kind of formal coldness. What role does this tension between emotion and restraint play?

I couldn’t say exactly what role that tension plays. My painting is rooted in the autobiographical, in memory, and in situations I have lived through that were quite traumatic for me. Perhaps, as a protective mechanism—to prevent direct access to that vulnerability, or to keep it from becoming harmful—that distance appears unconsciously. It is not something planned or controlled; it simply emerges and remains there.

Night Painter. Acrylic on canvas. 35 × 27 cm. 2025.

Your visual language oscillates between the naïve and the unsettling, the familiar and the strange. How do these tensions coexist for you, and what function do they serve in your visual exploration?

I think it reflects who I am. One could not exist without the other. The naïve could not exist without the unsettling; for me, they necessarily go hand in hand. I am deeply drawn to mystery and to the act of painting things that even I do not fully understand. Many of the expressions or portraits I create emerge from the unconscious; they are not planned. It is only afterwards that I begin to understand them—and almost never immediately. A considerable amount of time always passes before I can recognize how I was feeling at the moment I made them.

Qi. Acrylic on canvas. 81 × 65 cm. 2025.

The formal simplicity of your images does not seem to be a matter of economy, but of concentration. What kind of aesthetic truth do you believe painting can reach when it strips itself of everything superfluous?

I couldn’t say what aesthetic truth lies behind that simplicity. What I do know is that it is something I need in order to feel calm. I feel overwhelmed when there are too many elements in a painting, and I have always been drawn to the minimal—to moments when there is little, when there is almost nothing. I believe that this stripping away allows me to approach painting from a different state: more focused, more silent. I can’t fully explain it, but it is there that I feel able to work with greater clarity.

Crucifixion. Acrylic on canvas. 41 × 33 cm. 2025.

To what extent do you plan your work, and how much space do you leave for the unexpected—or even for mistakes?

I usually feel more comfortable leaving space for the unexpected. I am interested in uncertainty; having everything under control strikes me as rather boring. I have tried it on some occasions, especially when I set out to work on a highly planned series, with fixed sketches that I then wanted to translate into painting, but it was not something I identified with. I felt that a fundamental part of the process disappeared: play—that space in which painting can surprise even myself. For that reason, I do not tend to plan too much, and when I do, it is in a very simple way: a few lines, a plane of color. I prefer everything to happen within the painting itself.